The Leaven of the Early Church Fathers Exposed—From Biblical Truth to Church Tradition

A loaf of moldy leavened bread

Were the Pharisees the Only Purveyors of Spiritual Leaven?

One of the most well-known biblical metaphors is leaven—the chemical agent that makes bread dough to rise. It is a descriptive biblical symbol of sin in one’s life that, like yeast that permeates dough, can permeate one’s life spiritually. During the biblical Feast of Unleavened Bread, YHVH instructs his people to remove all leavening from their homes for seven days—a vivid illustration of the divine mandate to remove sin from the house of our life. Paul warns the saints against the negative impact of spiritual leaven.

Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Messiah our passover is sacrificed for us: therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. (1 Cor 5:6–8)

But there is another type of spiritual leaven that is equally dangerous and that Yeshua warned his disciples about: the leaven of false religious doctrine.

How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. (Matt 16:11–12)

Then Yeshua said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. (Matt 16:6) 

And [Yeshua] charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod. (Mark 8:15) 

In the mean time, when there were gathered together an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one upon another, he began to say unto his disciples first of all, Beware ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. (Luke 12:10)

The leaven to which Yeshua here was the false doctrines that had crept into the Jewish religious system that was contrary to the written Word of Elohim. These were the traditions of men that had made the Word of Elohim of non-effect.

Then the Pharisees and scribes asked him, Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with unwashen hands? He answered and said unto them, Well hath Isaiah prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of Elohim, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do. And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of Elohim, that ye may keep your own tradition.…Making the word of Elohim of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye. (Mark 7:5–9, 13)

But do we really think that the Pharisees of Yeshua’s day were the only religious leaders to be guilty of the sin of promoting spiritual leaven? Of nullifying the Word of Elohim by their manmade, non-biblical and sometimes even pagan traditions? Hardly. Humans are humans then and now regardless of the epoch, the culture or country. There is nothing new under the sun, as Solomon declared.

This brings us to the so-called early church fathers of second century of the common era, who laid much of the theological foundation for the modern Christian church by interpreting biblical Truth in a particular and often slanted way, which we will document and discuss below.

The Rails of Biblical Truth

The Bible has given us certain spiritual guidelines, like rails on train track, to keep us pointed in the right direction and on the track toward redemption or salvation, sanctification and eventually the eternal reward of glorification and adoption into the family of Elohim. They help to keep our faith strong during our spiritual journey and our focus straight ahead and pointed toward the end  goal. Any deviation therefrom threatens to head us in a completely different direction with a different end point.

Indeed, Christianity tends to promote keeping one’s eyes on Jesus, who, in a sense, is the end goal. But in practical terms, what does that actually mean? Do we keep our eyes only on a personality? Or is Christianity more than a personality cult? Too often Christianity has tended to be the religion about Jesus, not the religion of Yeshua. Shouldn’t we be trying emulate how he lived by obeying what he taught? It is one thing to keep our focus on Yeshua—a good thing, but at another and higher level, it’s another thing actually to obey what he taught—his commandments, which tell us how to love him and our fellow man, and how to live a life of holiness and being set-apart from this world, or, in other words, to be in the world but not of the world. 

At the center of the religion of Yeshua is holiness, which is about separation. Separation from what? From that which is polluted, impure, profane and defiled. It is about becoming holy as YHVH is holy. What pollution? The pollution of the world, the flesh and the devil. There are several key element or rails of the track of holiness that will lead us to becoming separate from the world and closer to our Father in heaven. What are they? They have to do with holy food and holy times. The foods YHVH’s people eat and the special times that YHVH has called “holy” or “set-aprt” are when he commands his saints to come out of the world and to focus on him. This has a lot to do with true biblical holiness. It is about transcendency, that is, transcending above the profane or worldly or coming out of the world to commune with Elohim and his people who love him. A holy diet and observing holy times are essential to keep one’s spiritual train on the track that leads to holiness. For example, if you can neither eat the world’s food nor observe their holidays and celebrations, that largely puts you on the outs with the world, doesn’t it? Eating special food and observing special times puts you on a different track from the world. Thus, the biblical dietary laws along with YHVH’s Sabbaths (the weekly Sabbath and biblical feasts) are separating elements, and that is what holiness is all about—separating from the world, being holy are set-apart, and being called out of the world. After all, is not the word ecclesia meaning “the called out ones,” which is the Greek word behind the word church in the New Testament, is all about?

In many ways, the early church fathers of the second century and onward, in a markedly and determinant manner, veered off the rails of the Hebraic faith of Yeshua and his apostles and commenced to move in an unbiblical direction, which they then passed on down to the Christian church to this day. If we care about biblical Truth, we must face the fact that the early church fathers, like their ancient Jewish predecessors, have passed on down many lies, which we have inherited many lies (Jer 16:19). In real and substantial ways, and in their own words, they have, to one degree or another, rejected the Truth of YHVH’s Torah and considered it a strange thing as did the ancient Israelites (Hos 4:6; 8:12). They too have even rebelled against it (Hos 8:1)! The call is now going out to come back to the good and ancient paths of Torah (Jer 6:19), to return to the law of Moses and to the Hebraic fathers of our faith before the great and terrible day of YHVH’s wrath comes on the earth quickly and unexpectedly (Mal 4:4–6; Hos 6:1).

So the rails of our biblical faith that lead to the kingdom of Elohim included teaching and then living out YHVH’s Torah-laws along with his standards of holiness including the seventh day Sabbath, the biblical feasts and the biblical dietary laws. The Bible defines these not only as obedience issues, but holiness issues that help to keep YHVH’s people separate from the world around them, and are also essential helping them to maintain a right and personal relationship with YHVH himself. It’s about love. Yeshua said that, if you love me, then keep my commandments (John 14:15, 21).

The Bible predicted that YHVH’s people would turn from his Truth again and again. It is called apostasy. It is an endless cycle that has repeated itself many times over the long history of YHVH’s people. And, sadly, it repeated itself in some major ways with the early church fathers. Don’t believe me? Shortly below, we will document this in their own words as show utter disdain for the Hebraic roots of their faith, the Jewish people and many of YHVH’s instructions in righteousness—his Torah-law, of which the biblical feasts, the seventh day Sabbath and YHVH’s dietary laws are key exhibit one.

Curiously, and the facts of history bear this out, the seventh day Sabbath, the biblical feasts and dietary laws along with an opposition to YHVH’s Torah also known as the Mosaic law were among the first aspects of biblical Truth that YHVH’s people including the early church fathers abandoned. Apostasy began here. And, down the line, as YHVH’s people wake up to the fact that, in many respects, they have left the rails of their Hebraic faith, it is Sabbath, feasts and biblical dietary laws to which they usually first return. To move forward spiritual toward one’s ultimate destiny, one must first backtrack to where the errant side rails branched off the main rail line in a different direction, and this time take the right track. The way out is the way back in, and the way back is the way forward. 

Now let us examine the written historical record of the sad apostasy or abandonment of much biblical Truth by the early church father from their own writings.

Discovering How the Early Church Fathers Jumped Off the Track of Holiness

In what follows, I document from the actual writings of the early church fathers of the second century onward many outright lies, false teachings, deceptions, twisting of the Scriptures, calumnies, virulent racist anti-semitism and blasphemies that are contrary to the Truth of the Bible. When you read their actual quotes, one has to wonder if some of them had ever read the Bible, or if so, how well they knew the Scriptures. Yet sadly many fundamental doctrines of present day normative Christianity are based on the writings of these men. As the Bible says, our fathers have inherited many lies. It is time to learn the truth, and when you do, you will be set free from the doctrines and traditions of men that make of non-effect the Word of Elohim!

At the same time and in all fairness to the objective truth, the early church fathers have written much that is good. They are valiant and often brilliant in their combatting the various pagan Greek philosophies and Christian heresies of their day. Admittedly, one can learn much from them, but why not go directly to the source of wisdom and Truth—the Bible instead—and feed on the manna from heaven rather than on food that has gone through the filters of men’s spiritual digestive systems and then regurgitated out as second hand pap? This assessment of what they have to say may sound harsh and even crass, but when actually takes the time to read much of what they have to say that is contrary to the precious Truth of YHVH Elohim as revealed in the Scriptures, this assessment is mildly stated. 

Sadly, and in many respects, there is manifested among many if not most of the early church fathers a lack of understanding of the more distinct and foundational Hebraic concepts of the Scriptures such as the relevance of YHVH’s Torah-law to the life of the saint. In many of their writings, they seem to rely more on human reasoning and philosophical explanations than on the Written Word of Elohim to make their points. It is true that some of the fathers seemed to have had a more complete knowledge of the Scriptures than others. This may be due to the fact that they had better access to the actual (scarce) scrolls and books containing the Scriptures than others of their contemporaries. Whatever the case, nearly all of them were non-Jewish, and thus were not raised in a Hebraic culture as were the writers of the Scriptures; therefore, their understanding is deficient in this area. Rather, they came from a Hellenistic cultural background and were influenced, to one degree or another, by the Greek philosophers, whose ideas permeated and informed the culture and ethos of the Roman empire. This is evident in the writings of the early church fathers where there seems to be a lack of understanding of the Hebraic (Oriental) mindset or perspective, and an acquiescence, instead, to that of the Greek perspective with its philosophical backdrop and approach (i.e., humanistic reasoning) as I will document below.

With these things in mind, let us now bring to the light of day some of the more anti-Torah and virulent anti-Jewish theologies of the early church fathers, which have been scattered prolifically throughout the thousands of pages of their writings. The theological foundation they laid in these writing eventually gave rise to philosophical and theological Christianity, which insinuated itself into and was codified into mainstream Christian church dogma and became part of a religious system (or churchianity) that became known as Roman Catholicism and was then passed on down the various iterations of mainstream Christianity as we know it today.

All of the following quotes, unless otherwise noted, are from The Ante-Nicene Church Fathers—The Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325, edited by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson; Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, Mass.: 1995.

The Writings of the Earliest Church Fathers That Are Opposed to Bible Truth

The Seventh Day Sabbath and the Biblical Feasts Annulled

Continue reading
 

Free Passover and Feast of Unleavened Bread Educational Resources

Many of us are busily preparing our hearts and homes to celebrate the Passover which is immediately followed by the Feast of Unleavened Bread the next day. For those of us on the visible new moon/abib barley calendar, this year Passover occurs on Tuesday, April 23 and the first high holy day Sabbath of the Feast of Unleavened falls on Wednesday, April 24 with the seventh day of this feast, another Sabbath, occurring on Tuesday, April 30.

Over the years, I have prepared many teaching resources to help people to understand the importance or YHVH’s biblical feasts and along with their historical significance, their relevance to his people today as it relates to the gospel message and our walk with Yeshua along with any of their prophetic implications.

To help you to celebrate these current feasts with meaning and purpose, here is a list of links to some of these free resources.

The Biblical Calendar

The Biblical Feasts in General

Passover

The Feast of Unleavened Bread

Playlist of Videos on the Biblical Feasts

 

The Fatal Flaws of the “Zadok Priestly/Enoch Calendar”

By Nathan Lawrence

This is a lengthy, deep dive into the so-called Zadok Priestly/Enoch/Qumran/Dead Seas Scrolls Calendar as opposed to the traditional visible crescent new moon/abib barley calendar that was extant in the second temple era and during the time of Yeshua and his followers. This is a detailed, technical and somewhat tedious read. If you are not inclined to slog your way through this, I suggest that you scroll down to the end and read my concluding overview comments.


Division and Strife Within the Messianic, Hebraic Roots Movement

New winds of doctrine and ear tickling teachings are perpetually blowing through the Hebraic roots movement. I refer to it as “The Flavor of the Month Club. A few examples of this include: the lunar Sabbath, following rabbinic Judaism, the flat earth, new calendars, plural marriage or polygamy, unorthodox Bible translations, sacred names cults to name a few.

It seems that many people including some Bible teachers are ever learning and never coming to a knowledge of the truth (2 Tim 3:7). One minute they are championing this new doctrine (and peddling their merchandise to promote it and gaining a following), then the next minute they are promoting some new doctrine and their money grubbing gig repeats itself.

Sadly, the Hebraic roots movement lacks true scholars or those who have learned critical thinking skills, the rules of biblical interpretation or hermeneutics and exegesis which are based on the science of logic. Thus, the movement is full of many unskilled teachers who teach errant doctrines and proffer false information. Buyers beware!

Add to the unskilled teacher the many self-appointed Bible “experts” and “teachers” who have neither been mentored by or are accountable to anyone including spiritual elders, who are more likely to possess knowledge, wisdom and understanding and can help mentor and raise up the aspiring Bible teachers who are new in the faith or their understanding of Torah roots of biblical Christianity.

On top of all of this, enter the internet where anyone can get up and say anything no matter how inaccurate, whacky or off-the-wall ridiculous and gain a following especially if what they are saying is well-packaged and marketed. A good package can make even nonkosher treif look appealing, tantalizing and palatable.

In Matthew 24, Yeshua warned us against false teachers, prophets and those who claim to be anointed (little messiahs, if you will). Even the very elect could be deceived (Matt 24:24 cp. 2 Pet 2:1–3)!

How to Examine New Information

I went into this study open-minded. What can I learn? Honestly, I knew very little about the so-called Zadok priesthood, the Qumran community, the Essenes and my understanding of the teachings of the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) was rudimentary at best. When examining new knowledge, we must be careful to guard against bias confirmation—that is, looking only to information that confirms our preconceived notions or our current deeply held beliefs about something. Maintaining objectivity and keeping an open mind is essential if one is searching for truth. We must let the facts speak for themselves (in hermeneutics referred to as exegesis) as opposed to reading into the facts our own interpretations and biases (eisegesis).

A Picture Quickly Began to Form Regarding Zadok Priestly or Enoch Calendar 

The more I listened to the proponents of the so-called Zadok calendar, the more I realized that their arguments are fundamentally flawed. A house may look beautiful, but if it is built on a foundation of sand or straw, no matter how wonderful the superstructure may look, it will fall down. I soon discovered, and it is easy to see, that the arguments for the Zadok calendar are built on a foundation of sand or straw. The advocates of the Zadok calendar make many gross and misleading assumptions at the outset and then build their case from that point onward. That is like saying that 2 + 2 = 5, and then building a system of mathematics on that premise. No matter how elaborate and sophisticated that system may look, it is still predicated upon a false premise and is thus erroneous and irrelevant. This is the case with the Zadok calendar.

Don’t Be So Open Minded That Your Brains Fall Out!

There is no doubt that many people who are teaching, promoting and following the Zadok calendar are well meaning and zealous truth seekers. Their heart is intent on serving YHVH Elohim and rediscovering biblical truths that have been lost over time or purposely hidden by Christian and Jewish religious systems. But as we search for truth, we must make certain to get our facts straight before moving into a new belief system, so that we do not repeat the errors of the past. Stay open minded in the search for truth, but keep your wits about you. We can’t be so open minded that our brains fall out and we end up unwittingly following a false teaching.

In recent times, past erroneous belief systems have fallen away as our understanding of Bible truth has been ungraded as we return to the truths of our biblical and Hebraic roots. The problem is that some people are ever learning and never coming to the truth. As soon as a new “truth” comes on the scene, too many people jump on the band wagon of that new doctrine. It was a problem in the first century, and it is a problem now. Sadly, there is always a bevy of well-meaning but misguided teachers, as well as just plain false and greedy peddlers who are all too willing to take people’s money as they promote their new teachings. The Bible warns us against these folks. Therefore and ultimately, it is the duty and responsibility of each Bible student to roll up his or her sleeves and to prove who is right or wrong based on what the Bible says. When you buy an automobile or house, do you just blindly take the seller’s word for it that all is good, or do you investigate, ask questions, and even seek the help of impartial experts to determine if what you are about to purchase is in good condition and is all that it is represented to be? To wit, the Bible instructs us to rightly divide the word of Elohim, to be good Bereans and see if what we are being told lines up with the Scriptures or not, and to prove all things and to hold fast to that which is good. There are no short cuts in this process. It requires hard work and much effort.

Does the Bible or Nonbiblical Sources Determine Truth?

A big question each person has to ask themselves when determining spiritual truth is whether they are going to rely primarily or foundationally on the Bible or primarily on secular sources. I have no problem with looking to reputable, secular or extra-biblical sources for background information that supports what the Bible says. However, there is a problem when we look to extra-biblical sources as our primary source of truth, and then reach back into the Bible and cherry pick verses therefrom to confirm what the secular sources are saying. This is exactly what mainstream Christian theologians and Bible teachers have been doing since the time of the early church fathers in their efforts to disprove the seventh day Sabbath, the biblical feasts, the biblical dietary laws and YHVH’s Torah-law in general. Let’s not repeat their mistakes and end up with a tangled web of truth and error that characterizes much of current Christian theology.

Beware of Sectarianism and Exclusivism Which Can Lead to Cultism

Everyone wants to feel special and unique. This is affirming to our human need for self-esteem and self-worth. Often this leads people to feel the need to be special and better than others because they have something that no one else possesses. Religious people are often prone to this tendency in their search for meaning and truth. To believe that one has an inside track on the truth resulting in membership in an exclusive group that has secret knowledge can be psycho-emotionally empowering. Because of this, some people can be led to believe that they a special relationship with Elohim that no one else has. But being part of an exclusive group is dangerous when what we believe is not based on Bible truth, especially if we are following a personality who is promoting this hidden truth or secret knowledge. This is often the basis for secret societies, clubs, fraternal organizations, political parties and even many religious organizations. This can even become a form of neo-gnosticism. This is how religious cults are formed.

Addressing Pro-Zadok Calendar Arguments

In response to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCXV76e8dgE&list=PLdoqNkN5ekbjKOCFdQTL7o7hIahXOsLiC&index=6 (a teaching by two of Eddie Chumney’s disciples speaking in their local congregation):

  • The claim is made that the term rosh chodesh is found only three times in the Bible and is not proof that the new month begins at the sighting of the new moon. This is a specious argument and is proof of nothing. The Torah says that a matter must be confirmed in the mouth of two or three witnesses. The Hebrew word chodesh meaning “new moon” is found 279 times in the OT.
  • The claim is made that Exodus 12:2 does not specifically state this will be the first day of the month or new year. However, it is implied that this is the case since in verse two we read that on the tenth of the month the lamb is separated out for Passover. Day ten makes no sense, unless we are counting from day one of this month, which is implied in verse two. The Scriptures imply many things that are not explicitly spelled out or stated in black and white but the context clearly indicates a fact (e.g., Nadab and Abihu were drunk, do not light a fire on Shabbat if it is a work related fire). Interestingly, of these three verses, the Dead Seas Scrolls Bible reads the same as the Masoretic Text.
  • Their claim is correct that the Zadok priesthood is the true priestly lineage with YHVH’s authority to judge in controversial matters regarding Torah (Ezek 44:24 cp. Deut 17:8–13), but this does not imply that all of the Essenes were Zadokites (i.e., descendants from Zadaok the high priest), that everything that the Essenes taught was exactly true to Scripture, or that everything that the Pharisees and Sadducees taught was unscriptural. That is like saying that everything that mainstream Christianity teaches is unscriptural. It is not. To say it is would be an ignorant lie.
  • The assumption is made that many of Yeshua’s disciples were Nazarenes (and thus members of the Qumran community or Essenes including Mary and Martha). There is zero biblical proof of this. For example, if Zechariah, the father of John, was a Nazarene, then how could he continue to officiate as a priest in the temple under the Sadducean system?
  • It is assumed, without biblical proof, that John was a Nazarene and an Essene.
  • Supposedly, Yeshua was an Essene based on the etymology of the word Nazarene, which goes back to the Hebrew word branch, which is one of the terms the Qumran community applied to themselves. Isn’t that like saying that because the word law appears in my last name Lawrence, that must mean that I am a law-yer? Also, the Book of Acts refers to the early believers as being of The Way, which was also an Essene term. That’s like saying that because I call myself a Christian, that is proof that I am a Roman Catholic/Orthodox/Protestant or some other type of Christian you want to name. This may or may not be true.

The following is from my own Bible commentary notes on Matthew 2:23 and explains the etymological origins of the words Nazareth and Nazarene:

Nazareth…Nazarene. (Cp. Acts 24:5). Nazareth means “the guarded one”. The name Nazareth is not found in the OT. The closest word similar to it is naziyr (or nazarite) meaning “one who is consecrated, devoted.” Naziyr derives from nazar meaning “to dedicate, consecrate, separate, to keep sacredly separate.” The appellation “the sect of the Nazarenes” was applied to the early redeemed Israelite believers in Acts 24:5 by their enemies.

There is debate among some Bible students about whether the word Nazarene derives from Nazareth. The fact that Matthew juxtaposes the two words in a form of literary parallelism indicates that he saw some etymological, spiritual or prophetic connection between them. 

There is no Old Testament prophecy declaring that the Messiah will come from Nazareth or will be called a Nazarene, nor does any known apocryphal or pseudepigraphal text include such a statement. So to what prophecy is Matthew referring? He may be making a wordplay on the similarities between the Hebrew words Nazarene and netzer meaning “branch” as it relates to the Messianic title in Isaiah (Isa 11:1 cp. Isa 53:2) (Commentary on the NT on the OT, p. 11 by Beale and Carson). Keener mentions other Old Testament prophets that likened Messiah to a tree branch (or scion from Judah), although they do not use the Hebrew word netzer in their prophecies(Jer 23:5; Zech 3:8; 6:12) (The IVP Bible Background Commentary—New Testament, p. 51, by Craig S. Keener).

  • Chumney then quotes Dr. Robert Shriner from his book,Yeshua—He Will Be Called a Nazarene, who says that Matthew (Matt 2:23) is not linking Yeshua to the town of Nazareth (based on linguistics) but is connecting him rather to the sect of the Nazarenes or Essenes. This is further confirmed in Acts 24:5 where Paul is linked with the sect of the Nazarenes (or Essenes). This apparently is positive proof that Yeshua and Paul were connected spiritually to the Essenes. The same scholar asserts that some verses in the NT where the word Nazarene is found associates Yeshua with the town of Nazareth, while others associate him with the Essenes. Both the words Nazarene and of Nazareth are the Greek words (G3480, found 18 times in the NT), while the word Nazareth (G3478) is different, though related. Shriner maintains that the phrase of Nazereth is referring to the Essenes, since if it were referring to being an inhabitant of Nazareth, it would be a different Greek word. Chumney then relates Yeshua being an Essene back to Isaiah 11:1 who is prophetically called “The Branch.” This prophecy is stating, among other things, that Yeshua (and his disciples) would have been connected to the Essene community, which the NT seems to indicate. Chumney then quotes Yair Davidy (a non-scholar and a sloppy historian who makes many unsubstantiated statements in his books) to further substantiate his belief. 
  • The non-biblical book of Jubilees 2:9 (found in the DSS and written ca. 100 to 25 BC) is another supposed proof of the solar-based not lunar-based Zadok calendar for determining Sabbaths, feasts, etc.
  • Jubilees 6:23 mentions four special days of remembrance that are the first days of certain months each season. This is based on the dates listed during Noah’s flood and were supposedly ordained by Noah.
  • The claim is made that the Zadok/Enoch calendar year is 364 days long and that the Hillel II calendar is 354 days long. This is false when you intercalate a thirteenth month seven times every 19 years. This makes the abib barley, visible new moon calendar a lunar-solar calendar that now syncs with the solar year of 365.25 days unlike the Enoch calendar of 364 days (1 Enoch Ethiopic Version 73:11; 81:7 cp. 72:4–5).
  • The Zadok/Enoch calendar is 360 days plus four “special days of remembrance” at the beginning of each season (Jubilees 6:23), which equates to a 364 day year. Proponents of the Zadok calendar claim that Noah (not YHVH) ordained them forever, and therefore, we are mandated to do the same. Where is this in the Bible??? These special days of remembrance are based on the spring equinox. That is how you know when to observe them. This is an unbiblical reckoning since there is neither any mention of the equinox in Scripture nor any command to reckon the biblical calendar thereto.
  • Proponents of the Zadok calendar claim that because the sun is the greater light and the moon is the lesser light (Gen 1:16), the sun, therefore must regulate the calendar, not the moon which is the lesser light. The claim is also made that all of the ancient calendars (e.g., Babylonian, Egyptian, etc.) were lunar based including the Hebrew calendar, which, it is also claimed came from the Babylon influence while the Jews were in exile. However, it is incorrect to say that the Hebrew calendar is a lunar calendar. It is a lunar-solar calendar.
  • The claim is made that the new year begins on either the eve of the tenth of the first month at Passover. Therefore, if day 14 is four days after the first day of the month, then day 14 is not really day fourteen as the Bible calls it, but, in reality, is day four on the biblical calendar. This assertion, however, contradicts Scripture—specifically, Exodus 12:2–3, which, if this claim is true, makes no sense when the Torah says to separate the lamb on the tenth day of the month and keep it until the fourteenth day of the month (four days after the tenth of the month), which is actually the first day of the month. This kind of illogical reasoning and twisting of the Scriptures is mind-boggling if not mind-numbing, to say the least!
  • It is claimed, as supposed proof of the Zadok calendar, that the Bible mentions 12 months in a year two times (Est 2:12; Dan 4:29) and by implication two more times (1 Kgs 4:7; Rev 22:2), but never a thirteenth month as occurs every two to four years on the abib barley, visible new moon calendar. Therefore, the claim is made that the abib barley, visible new moon calendar is not in line with Scripture. On the other hand, the counterclaim can also be made that nowhere does Scripture mention or even make allusions to a vernal equinox, which is critical to and a central component of the Zadok calendar. So where does that leave us? Simply this. Absence of evidence is not validation of a thing one way or the other.
  • The Zadokites claim that while the Gospel of John gives the Passover on the Pharisee/Sadducee calendar (which Zadokites conflate with the Hillel 2 calendar of A.D. 360), which, according to them, is why John calls this Passover “the feast of the Jews”, while the other Gospel writers supposedly give the timing of the Passover on the Zadok calendar. This apparently clarifies in their minds the confusion between Yeshua’s celebrating an early Passover on the Jewish calendar but actually on the fourteenth day of the first month on the Zadok calendar. The Jews celebrated Passover at the end of the fourteenth going into the fifteenth, which John refers to as the “Jews’ Passover” (John 2:13; 6:4; 11:55). The claim is made that Yeshua actually died when the Passover lambs on the Pharisees’ calendar were being killed. Supposedly, Yeshua and his disciples killed their Passover lamb earlier in accordance with the “true” biblical or Torah/Zadok calendar. This is, supposedly, because “John was a Nazarene” (sic, here Chumney confuses John the Baptist with John the disciple and writer of the Gospel that bears his name), and was thus part of the Qumran community, who referred to themselves as “Nazarenes.” Thus John was signaling that Yeshua as a Nazarene held the true Passover with his disciples earlier, while he actually died on the Pharisees’ calendar (although it was not actually the Passover according to the Zadok calendar). According to the proponents of the Zadok calendar, why did Yeshua die on the Jew’s Passover and not on the “true” Passover according to the Zadok calendar? He did so, they claim, to prove the point that he was the Jews’ Passover Lamb. A major problem with this argument is that John, the Gospel writer was not John the Baptist, and thus a Nazarite or member of the Qumran community as John the Baptist is alleged to have been. John the Revelator and John the Baptist were two different people! So the year that Yeshua died on the Zadok calendar was one day ahead of the Jewish calendar. Thus Joseph and Nicodemus wanted to get Yeshua off the cross before the Sabbath going into the Jews’ first high holy day of Unleavened Bread on their calendar, not on the Zadok calendar for that year. Are you confused yet by this interpretation? It’s a bit mind numbing to say the least!
Continue reading
 

Dead Sea Scrolls & Solar Calendar Misinformation Update

In this video, Nathan analyzes information brought forth by noted Dead Seas scrolls scholar and biblical historian and linguist, Dr. James Tabor who is a professor emeritus of University of North Carolina. Tabor has been working with the DSS for many decades and is an authority on the subject. As an objective and impartial expert and educator, Nathan was curious to know his views on the subject of the Zadok calendar, the Qumran community, the Essenes and the Dead Sea scrolls. The information that Tabor presents is revealing and flies in the face of what many of the proponents of the Zadok calendar are claiming.

 

The Unbiblical “Zadok/Enoch Calendar” & Its Fatal Flaws Exposed

In this video, Nathan Lawrence goes head to head with those who are promoting the so-called Enoch/Zadok priestly calendar, and he exposes the unbiblical and fatal flaws thereof. The promoters of this heretical calendar rely solely on extra-biblical sources to prove their point, then cherry pick out a few Bible verses out of context, and twist those verses to confirm their bias. This is dishonesty! Nathan shows how they do the very thing that they accuse the Christian church of doing when it attempts to do away with the Torah, the Sabbath, the biblical feasts and dietary laws. This is a hard hitting video and is not for the faint of heart, but is for those who are biblical Truth seekers and believe that the Bible, the Word of Elohim, is all that we need to determine spiritual Truth.