Category Archives: Tabernacle of Moses

Nathan’s Commentary on Parashat Vayikra Leviticus 1:1–5:26

Posted on by
Reply

Leviticus 1–7

An Overview of the Sacrificial System

Although Jewish and Christian scholars disagree about whether the sacrifices were to cease after the coming of the Messiah, as Edersheim points out, all agree that the object of a sacrifice was substitution for the offender (The Temple—Its Ministry and Service, p. 90). He also notes that the Jewish fathers along with the Scriptures that all of these substitutionary sacrifices pointed to none other than the Messiah. This understanding is especially expressed in the proto-rabbinic biblical Aramaic commentaries or Targumim (e.g., Targum Jonathan and the Jerusalem Targum; ibid., p. 92). Later rabbinic sages, in light of the rise of Christianity, were loath to accept this interpretation and, to this day, pretend it was never the belief of their ancient predecessors. 

As the Tanakh progresses, the concept of the substitutionary sacrifice as it relates to the sinner and to the Messiah expands and unfolds. The unity of the Tanakh in this regard and its progression of revelation on this subject must be taken into consideration when studying the sacrifices listed in Leviticus and the rest of the Torah if we are to understand completely the biblical concept of substitutionary sacrifice as well as the Messianic prophecies. The concept of sacrifice in the Tanakh point us prophetically in progressive stages to the sin-atoning death of the Messiah on behalf of sinners. Such passages in the Tanakh as Psalms chapters 2, 22, 35, 69, 72, 89, 110, 118 along with Isaiah 52:13–53:12 (many other scriptural passages could be cited here as well) point undeniably to the Person and work of Yeshua the Messiah including his suffering and glorification. The apostolic writers understood these prophecies and how Yeshua fulfilled them perfectly (e.g., Isa 52:13–53:12 cp. Heb 9:11–15; 10:4–7, 1; etc.), and this understanding forms the basis for the New Testament, which the authors thereof refer to as The Testimony of Yeshua (Rev 1:9; 6:2; etc.).

All the animals slaughtered in the sacrificial system were similar, in modern terms, to the minimum amount due on a credit card statement of a bill so huge one cannot possible pay the balance; therefore, one is able only to afford to pay the minimum amount due until somehow, miraculously, someone will step in to pay the full amount. Yeshua paid that monstrously huge sin debt for each of us at the cross. All of the sacrifices in the Tabernacle of Moses were merely tiny down payments on the vast sin bill that each sinner owed for his sins and which would ultimately be paid by Yeshua’s death on the cross. The penalty for sin is death, and this debt can only be paid by the death of the sinner. Once he is dead, then what? No more life. This is why Yeshua had to pay the price for man, so that we might live forever and not die forever. How could Yeshya’s death pay for all of humanity? After all he was only one man. This is possible only because the Bible reveals in numerous places that Yeshua was the Creator of man (John 1:3, 10; Heb 1:2, 10; Col 1:16) thus making his death life more valuable than all that he ever created, even as the builder of the house is more valuable than the house he builds (Heb 3:6). 

Six Types of Offerings (Heb. korban) Offered on the Altar (Lev 1-7)

Burnt or Elevation (Heb. Olah) Offering (Lev 1:3–17) 

The olah or ascending offering signified the offerer giving himself up totally, wholly ascending or complete surrender to Elohim. The priests offered up this sacrifice twice daily—the morning and evening (Exod 29:38–42; Num 28:1–8). This offering was always a male animal whose blood was to be sprinkled around the altar. The offerer was to lay his hands on the head of the animal before it was slaughtered symbolizing substitutionary atonement for sins. The offering would be accepted as a sweet aroma by Elohim.

The daily burnt offering was made in conjunction with a meal or grain offering and a wine libation (Exod 29:38–42; Num 28:1–8). Burnt offerings (along with the grain offering and wine offering or libation) were also made on the weekly Sabbath, at the new moon, on the all of the biblical feasts. These burnt offerings (including the one offered on Passover day) were in addition to the twice daily burnt offerings. This was a perfect prophetic picture of Yeshua’s death on the cross and of the communion cup, which memorializes our Savior’s death.

Meal, Grain or Meat, (Heb. Minchah) Offering (Lev 2:1–16; 6:14-23)

This offering was brought in conjunction with the burnt and peace offerings or by itself. The name minchah implies a gift, present or a tribute to a superior and proclaimed the offerer’s acknowledgement that his life is in Elohim’s hands. This offering was made of finely ground flour mixed with oil, salt and frankincense (and water) and could contain no leavening or honey. When part of the burnt offering, it was combined with the drink offering or wine libation, which was poured out on the altar (Exod 29:38; Num 28:5–7).

It was brought by people too poor to afford anything else as a trespass offering (Lev 5:11). 

Fine flour represents Yeshua and oil symbolizes both the Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim and the Torah (i.e., Spirit and Truth). This offering could be baked or fried. If fried it was done so in oil and broken into three pieces with oil poured over it. This offering speaks of Yeshua’s death, burial and resurrection with which the believer must identify when he eats the elements of communion.

Sin (Chatat) Offering (Lev 4:1–35; 6:24–30)

This offering was made for general sin (violation of any of YHVH’s commandments), and not specific or special offences (as was the case with the trespass offering). The sin offering symbolized general redemption or atonement for the individual offender (including rulers, priests or common people) or for the whole congregation of Israel, and like the trespass offering, was for only for sins committed in ignorance, unintentionally or because of weakness as opposed to wilful sin or presumptuous sin In all cases, the offender would lay his hands on the head of the animal victim before it was slaughtered as a symbolic act of transferring the person’s sin guilt to the animal.

This offering involved a bull or a lamb offered on the altar and was eaten by the priests. Sin speaks of man’s sinful nature leading to sinful (unintentional) deeds for which man (including believers) needs atoning on an ongoing basis (1 John 1:9).

Trespass or Guilt (Asham) Offering (Lev 5:14–19; 6:5–7; 7:1–7)

This offering was made for specific transgressions committed in ignorance, weakness or unintentionally as a result of one voluntarily confessing his guilt. If one were too poor to bring a lamb, he could bring two turtle doves or pigeons, or on minchah or meal offering.

Peace or Fellowship (Shelam) Offering (Lev 3:1–7; 7:1–36)

This was a joyous sacrifice intended to celebrate one’s happy fellowship with Elohim through covenantal relationship. It’s as if YHVH is the guest of honor at the meal. It was offered voluntarily out of thanksgiving or in honor of a vow made to Elohim (Lev 7:12, 16). The peace offering may be what the psalmist had in view when he speaks of a sacrifice given in grateful fellowship with Elohim (Pss 54:6; 116:12).

This was a voluntary offering expressing the offerer’s desire to express thanks to Elohim and to seek friendship or communion with him. The priests and the offerer consumed the flesh of this offering in a meal that also included unleavened bread with oil and fine flour. This offering was a sign of a healthy and loving relationship between the offerer, the priests and Elohim.

Drink Offering (Gen 35:14; Exod 29:40–41; Num 28:7–10, 14–15, 24, 31)

This offering was poured out upon an existing offering such as the twice daily burnt offering. This offering can signify consecrating to Elohim or pouring one’s life out for his service (Phil 2:17).

Leviticus 1

Leviticus 1:1, Moses ends the word vayikra with a small aleph out of humility before YHVH (Tikkun, p. 225).

Herd…flock.The Hebrew means a herd of cattle (defined in v. 3, 5) or a flock of sheep or goats (defined in v. 10). 

Leviticus 1:3, Of his own free will. Acknowledgement of sin, repentance and acceptance of Yeshua the Messiah’s atoning death on the cross, which the burnt offering symbolically represented, is an act of a person’s free will. No one, including YHVH, compels a person to choose the path of redemption, salvation and life that YHVH has offered to humans. Each person has to make that spiritual transaction himself of his own volition, even though YHVH loves the whole world (John 3:16) and desires all to be saved (2 Pet 3:9).

The door of the tabernacle. This is a symbolic and prophetic metaphor for Yeshua the Messiah, who is the door to salvation (John 10:7–10).

Leviticus 1:4, Put his hand on. Acknowledgment and confession of sins is an individual matter.

To make atonement for him. Atonement and salvation is an individual matter.

Leviticus 1:5, He shall kill. In ancient Israel, a sinner was kill the animal to be sacrificed as an atonement for his sin. This act reinforced upon the individual’s heart and mind the gravity of his sin and the consequences there of upon an innocent animal, which symbolically pointed to the death of Yeshua, the Lamb of Elohim, upon the cross, who had to die for each person’s sins. If killing an innocent animal brings grief to a person’s heart, then how much more the death of Yeshua, the Son of Elohim? 

Sprinkle. Heb. word zaraq means “to scatter, sprinkle, toss, throw, scatter abundantly, strew.” The sprinkling of the blood of the sacrificed animal on and around the altar of sacrifice (and elsewhere in the tabernacle as well) is mentioned numerous times in the Torah (e.g. Exod 24:6; 29:16; Lev 1:11; 3:2, 8, 13; 4:6,17; 5:9; 7:2). The blood was even sprinkled on the people (Exod 24:8), and on Aaron and his sons (Exod 29:20–21). This is a prophetic picture of Yeshua bleeding, while dying on the cross and shedding his blood as an atonement for our sins. Yeshua’s sprinkling his blood on the cross fulfilled the sprinkling of blood under the sacrificial system in the following ways:

Continue reading →
 

Nathan’s Commentary on Parashat Vahakel-Pekudie Exodus 35:1–40:38

Posted on by
Reply

Exodus 35

Exodus 35:2, The seventh day…shall be…a set-apart day. In our journey through the Torah, YHVH keeps interjecting instructions concerning the seventh day Sabbath. Why is this? Obviously this an important subject to YHVH, and was to be pivotal component in the life of his people—one that could be easily overlooked, forgotten or profaned. 

When YHVH instructed his people in Exodus 20:8 to “remember the Sabbath day to keep it set-apart (Heb. kadosh),” he was reminding the Israelites so they would not forget it! But this command has two parts: first, do not forget the Sabbath, and second, do not profane it, that is, keep it holy or set apart or holy by not polluting it with secular activities such as work and normal routine and daily activities. This day is to be special and different from all other days.

But there’s more. 

With each reminder to keep the Sabbath, the Creator gives additional instructions about how to keep the Sabbath set-part (see Gen 2:2–3; Exod 16:23–30; 20:8–11). 

In this passage, YHVH adds to the list of forbidden Sabbath-day activities not to kindle a fire as a requirement for properly observing the seventh day Shabbat. But the fire YHVH mentions here was not was not just any kind of fire, but a certain type of fire, as we will discuss below. Additionally, keeping the Sabbath was so important to the spiritual welfare of YHVH’s people that he prescribes the death penalty for those who worked on this day. And work is the operative issue, here, when it comes to not building a fire on the Sabbath. 

Why is Sabbath-observance so important to YHVH? This is because keeping the Sabbath is a crucial element in helping YHVH’s people to maintain a right relationship with their Creator. Those who observe Sunday as the “Lord’s day” and fail to rest on the seventh day are oblivious to this truth sadly to their own loss and detriment. Sabbath observance, if done according to Scripture, demands that one stop their weekly work routine, take a selah moment (that is to pause and to reflect), and to look heavenward for an entire 24-hour period. This is hardly the case for the majority of Sunday-keepers, who go to church for a couple of hours on that day and for the rest of the day it is more or less business as usual as they indulge in their carnal pursuits. 

Much more could be said about the critical value of the Sabbath that helps to keep YHVH’s people lined up spiritually with him and one’s fellow saints, but we discuss this in more detail elsewhere. Suffice it to say here, YHVH never sanctified (made holy or set-apart) or blessed the first day of the week, only the seventh day Sabbath (Gen 2:3). This speaks volumes about the importance the Creator, who never changes, placed and still places on the Sabbath. This day is foundational and axiomatic to the life of YHVH’s people, and when it is neglected or totally forsaken, they deprive themselves of an invaluable gift that heaven has graciously and beneficently bestowed upon work-weary man for his restful rejuvenation and spiritual edification.

On the supreme importance of the Sabbath, the religious Jews have a poignant adage that speaks volumes concerning how this day acts as a spiritual glue that helps to affix YHVH’s people him as well to hold the nation together in the midsts of the swirling toilet bowl of this world. They say, “It’s not that the Jews have kept the Sabbath over the millennia; it’s that the Sabbath has kept the Jews.”

Exodus 35:3, Kindle no fire…on the Sabbath day. 

Under What Circumstances Is Starting a Fire on the Sabbath Prohibited?

One of the Torah’s commands regarding the observance of the seventh day Sabbath is the proscription about building or kindling a fire on this day (Exod 35:3). There are several prevailing viewpoints as to the exact meaning of this passage. Let us now explore them and discover the true meaning of this important command.

The Orthodox Jews take to the furthest extreme the Torah’s prohibition to kindle no fire on the Sabbath. As such, many Jews refuse even to turn on a light switch or start their cars (i.e., fire occurs in the vehicle’s spark plugs as they ignite the fuel-filled cylinders). They also leave their stoves on for 24 hours, and unscrew the lights in their refrigerators on the Sabbath for fear of violating this command. As a counterpoint this view, the Torah commands the priest to light the menorah in the tabernacle each morning, the Sabbath not excluded (Exod 27:21–21; 30:7), and to prepare meat for the daily offerings to YHVH on the altar of sacrifice requiring a cooking fire. So, for ministry purposes, lighting a fire was not prohibited.

But interestingly, the command not to build a fire on the Sabbath (Exod 35:3) is followed directly by verse four where YHVH gives the Israelites initial instructions on building the tabernacle. What is the significance of the juxtaposition of these two passages as it relates to observing the Sabbath? Much. From this we learn an important truth. All Scripture must be viewed in the context in which it is found. This is a fundamental principle of logic and biblical interpretation. When a Scripture is cherry picked out of its context (called proof-texting), one can easily twist the Bible to make it say whatever one wants. The Bible often places one passage next to another without overtly connecting the two via the use of grammatical connector words. This is not a matter of the Bible throwing disparate and random subjects onto its pages haphazardly. YHVH is not the author of confusion. He is a God of order and purpose. Rather, YHVH teaches his people in ways that invites reflection, meditating, pondering and investigation. This involces a person’s engagement and interaction with the Word of Elohim. In so doing, a person is exploring the mind of Elohim and discovering hidden gold veins of truth and unearthing precious nuggets of understanding. For example, when we read Yeshua’s red-letter Gospel words, many of his ministry episodes and teachings appear to be placed in random order without any connection to each other. But upon closer contemplative, Spirit-led examination, one discovers that when the dots are connected, deeper truths and expansive and panoramic pictures emerge from the supposedly confusing Gospel narratives. 

An example in the Torah of juxtaposing two seemingly disparate ideas is the prohibition against the consumption of alcohol and the death of Nadab and Abihu, who offered strange fire in the tabernacle (Lev 10:1–7 cp. Lev 10:8–9). This teaches us that these two sons of Aaron were intoxicated when ministering in tabernacle thus causing them to err in judgment concerning following the strict protocols for coming into YHVH’s presence. We find another example of the Torah jusxtaposing two seemingly disparate topics in Exodus chapters 31 and 32. And the end of the former chapter, YHVH reaffirms the importance of the Sabbath as a sign of his covenant with his people, where they promised to worship him only and follow all of his Torah commandments. Then in Exodus chapter 32, the Torah recounts the Israelite’s declension into golden calf worship resulting in idolatry, debauchery and sexual licentiousness. As we have proven elsewhere, the placing of these two scriptures back-to-back obliquely teach us that the day of their idolatrous revelling and rebellion against YHVH occurred on the Sabbath—a direct violation of YHVH’s Torah-law at multiple levels. Had they adhered strictly to the Sabbath command, they would not have fallen into golden calf worship. Similarly and today, how many Sunday Christians ignore YHVH’s command to keep his Sabbath, while they are involved in the golden calf worship of working on the Sabbath to earn money and pursuing their own, often licentious, pleasures on this sacred and set-apart day?

Thus, the juxtapositioning of Scriptures without an apparent grammatical connection between them is a clever way that the Bible teaches truth, while hiding the deeper understanding of Scripture from the casual and superficial observer, while at the same time rewarding those who expend the laborious and diligent effort to dig out the diamonds and precious stones that lie just beneath the surface. This is a biblical, Hebraic way of teaching deeper truths through human engagement and investigation, and heaven is keen on rewarding those who diligently seek YHVH Elohim (Heb 11:6).

Thus, the immediate context of the Exodus 34 Sabbath-fire passage concerns starting fires that pertain only to one’s trade or job. In Israel’s case, their job was to build the mishkan or Tabernacle of Moses. Fires would have been needed for tanning hides, working with metal, and possibly bending wood and dying cloth along with other activities.

This we know for certain. On the Sabbath, YHVH’s people are not to bake, cook or prepare food from scratch (Exod 16:23), but Scripture does not prohibit reheating food—something that is even permitted in Orthodox Jewish circles today. What is the bottom line issue here? We are to cease our creative activities on the Sabbath, even as YHVH set us an example when he rested on the first Sabbath after having completed his creation activities (Gen 2:1–3). From this we learn that cooking food from scratch (as opposed to reheating), which changes the chemistry of the food, and thus constitutes creating something (i.e., transforming something from its original state into another state) is forbidden on the Sabbath. Thus food must be prepared ahead of time on the sixth day, but can then reheated on the Sabbath.

Does the Torah forbid the lighting of fires for heat and light? Some people would say yes, since part of preparing for the Sabbath involves insuring that your fire for heat and light must stay burning through the Sabbath without having to relight them. But, in reality, was this always possible in ancient times? That is a question we will now explore.

One thing is certain. It is doubtful that YHVH would have expected his hapless people to sit in the cold darkness on the Sabbath were their fire to have gone out—especially in the winter months when the days are shorter and colder, and when snow and cold rain are realities, even in the land of Israel. This would result in the loss of the delight of the seventh day, which, in itself, is a violation the Sabbath (Isa 58:13). 

The harsh realities of life in a primitive agrarian culture are evident. The ancient Israelites, obviously, did not possess electric lights or furnaces that lit and heated their homes at the push of a button. If YHVH’s Torah forbad the Israelites from lighting a fire for heat and light purposes, then they would have had to start a fire on Friday before sundown, and then keep it burning all night and through the Sabbath day. This means that if the fire happened to go out during the night because someone slept too soundly and failed to wake up to stoke the fire or add olive oil to their small terra cotta lamps (which burned only for a short time), then they would have been either forced to sit in the cold and dark on the Sabbath, or they would have to fetch some coals from a neighbor, whose fire had not gone out, in order to relight their fire. The Israelite who lived in town had another option as well. Often, there were public ovens built into the earth with clay cooking tubes for baking bread. For those who lived nearby, they could bring back some embers from these public ovens to restart their home fires (Manners and Customs of Bible Lands, pp. 47–48, by Fred H. Wight). Regardless, letting one’s fire go out would have been a great inconvenience and diminished the joy of the Sabbath day.

In modern times, for those who heat their homes with a wood stove, the most energy efficient home-sized wood stove will burn only for six to eight hours if one has access to hardwoods (like oak, maple or fruit wood) as fuel. Despite one’s best efforts to keep their wood stove burning all night to keep the house warm, at times the fire goes out. In most of the land of Israel, large hardwood trees are not prevalent. In ancient Bible times with several million Israelites constantly foraging for hardwood to keep their fires burning, the land would have quickly been depleted of trees—especially in that arid land where trees grow slowly. In reality, the Israelites were more likely to have used sticks (1 Kgs 17:10), thorn bushes, bundles of dried grass (Matt 6:30; Luke 12:28), coals (or charcoal?; John 18:18; 21:9) or dried dung for fire fuel (Ezek 4:15; ibid., p. 30). Furthermore, warming fires were often built in courtyards (John 18:18). Such fires did not burn long. At the same time, making fire would not have been an easy process either before the invention of matches, since this was accomplished by rubbing sticks together or by striking flint and steel (ibid. p. 31).

For sure we know that in days before matches, lighters, push-button furnaces, lights and stoves, starting and maintaining a fire was not a simple task. At the same time, it seems that YHVH would not have expected the Sabbath to end up becoming a miserable, weekly lesson in wilderness survival by having many of his servants forced to huddle together freezing in the darkness on this day of joyful rest because their lights and fires had gone out. He did, however, expect his people to make every possible effort to prepare for the Sabbath ahead of time to keep it from being just another day of laborious work (Exod 16:23). However, it seems hard to believe that the Torah forbids starting a fire for heat and light if necessary—especially during the winter months. Therefore, it is logical to believe that starting fires for work purposes was forbidden, but for heat and light purposes, if unavoidable, was permitted.

Exodus 35:5, Whosoever is of a willing heart. In Hebrew, the word nadiyb/CHSB translated as willing means “noble, inclined, generous.” The heart attitude of those contributing to the building materials of the tabernacle was obviously of paramount importance to YHVH. The Torah mentions it again several more times later in chapter (see verses 21–22, 26, 29).

Exodus 36

Exodus 36:5–6, The people bring much more. There are two ways to look at the children giving too large an offering of materials for the building of the tabernacle. There were, no doubt, those who contributed because of a willing heart to serve and obey YHVH. On the other hand, there were probably others who viewed this as a way to unburden themselves from some of the loot they took out of Egypt during the exodus. Consider the fact that all of this stuff had to be carted around the wilderness from one encampment to another, which was a lot of work. Gold and silver are heavy metals. So this may have been a good excuse to keep the loot you really wanted and to unburden oneself giving to a good. For these people, it was “charity” for personal convenience rather than a matter of the heart for the work of YHVH. 

Exodus 36:19, Covering for the tent. The tabernacle had four outer coverings. The outermost covering was made of either seal or badger skin (Exod 26:14; 36:19). This covering was ordinary and unattractive. This draws our attention to the fact that Yeshua, the Redeemer, was of ordinary appearance and not overly attractive in physiognomy (Isa 53:2). Likewise, few people are attracted to the gospel message because it is appealing to them. In reality, most people are forced to reach rock bottom in their lives before they are open to hearing the gospel’s message much less acting upon it and making the requisite changes and commitments that it requires of a person. For many people, embracing the gospel message is analogous to a drowning man who frantically grasps a life ring that has been thrown to him from a nearby ship! 

Continue reading →
 

Theosis: The “Deification” of Man and the Tabernacle of Moses

Posted on by
Reply

Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. (2 Peter 1:4)

The Tabernacle of Moses from its entrance to its innermost room symbolically represents one’s progression in their spiritual journey starting with initial salvation progressing to the glorification of the physical body and eternal life in YHVH’s eternal spiritual kingdom. Understanding the pattern and steps to him that our Father in heaven has  laid out in the tabernacle will give us deep revelation about where we have come from, where we are and where we must go to transcend this earthly existence while aiming at the heavenly goal that has been laid out before us.

Let’s now review the progressive steps in chronological order that YHVH has laid out in the tabernacle of Moses that is the blueprint of our journey toward him. 

Entering through the front door of the tabernacle and progressing toward the holy of holies is from the human perspective represents the path one takes in their journey upward toward Elohim; it is the perspective of moving from the human to the spiritual plane of existence or that of the earthbound looking heavenward, and from a child gazing upward and longingly toward his father. However, from YHVH Elohim’s view from the glory cloud that has hovering over the holy of holies just above the ark of the covenant, the perspective would be different. It was from the inside looking out, or from heaven looking downward. From a father looking downward toward his beloved children. We will discus the contrasting viewpoints between the human and divine in a moment.

In the outer courtyard of the tabernacle, all the rituals and furnishings therein pointed to death and judgment, as well as to washing or cleansing. These prophetically foreshadowed salvation through Yeshua’s atoning death on the cross, with Yeshua being the door to salvation, and one’s need to accept his death on the cross for one’s sins followed by the need of baptism for the remission of sins. 

In the set-apart (kadosh or holy) place inside the tabernacle, everything pointed to life, light, food, fragrant incense, the fruits and gifts of the Set-Apart or Holy Spirit, or, in other words, life in a spiritual relationship with Elohim subsequent to one’s taking the beginning steps in the salvation process. 

In summary, the outer court symbolically represents the basic salvation requirements that heaven stipulates for the redeemed believer in Yeshua, while the holy place speaks of spiritual growth and maturity, and of moving upward from spiritual babyhood and then growing into spiritual adulthood or maturity. 

To understand this process of growing in spiritual maturity, it is necessary to comprehend the tripartite composition of the human being. Paul speaks of man being subdivided into three parts—spirit and soul and body (1 Thess 5:23). The Tabernacle of Moses represents the tripartite nature of man in symbolic form. The tabernacle’s outer court relates more to the physical or bodily realm of the person, while the holy place represents the soul or intellectual, volitional and emotional aspects of one’s inner or psychological makeup. Finally, the holy of holies portrays man approaching YHVH through the realm of a person’s inner or personal spirit. 

As one progresses into the tabernacle, it is as if YHVH is drawing a person into an ever deeper relational walk with him starting at the most basic level progressing upward until one is finally communing with YHVH on a Spirit-to-(human personal)-spirit level (in the most holy place). It is the Father’s desire that his children progressively grow until each of us is communing with him at the highest spiritual level (see John 4:23–24; 1 Cor 2:10–12; Prov 20:27). 

This forward progression in one’s spiritual journey toward our Father in heaven from the tabernacle’s entrance to its innermost room is but one way to view a person’s spiritual progression into the realm of the Spirit of Elohim. From YHVH’s perspective, looking from the inside of the tabernacle outward, the view changes. Although one must enter the tabernacle through the outer gate and then go through various rites and rituals relating to a cleansing process before being allowed into the tabernacle itself, at the same time, we see YHVH starting to work with the person from the inside out. That is to say, when a person initially comes into a spiritual relationship with his Creator, YHVH first regenerates the person spiritually by putting his Set-Apart Spirit into one’s personal spirit. In a sense, if the tabernacle is a picture of the tripartite subdivision of a person’s life (spirit and soul and body), then YHVH starts working from the inside out  beginning in one’s personal spirit, which is one’s personal holy of holies that is inside of them. From there, the Set-Apart Spirit goes to work on the person’s soul (mind, will and emotions) to transform it spiritually into the mind or image of Yeshua (Rom 8:28–29; Rom 12:2 cp. Rom 7:13–8:17). This process will last a person’s lifetime. Finally, at the resurrection of the righteous saints at Yeshua’s second coming, the children of Elohim will receive their redeemed and glorified or god-like body (1 John 3:1–2) and be adopted into the family of Elohim (Rom 8:15, 23; Eph 1:5). At this time, they will become full-fledged, immortal spirit-children of Elohim (John 1:12; 1 John 3:1–3). Though the Bible teaches that humans can become sons of Elohim and be like him as part of his divine family, man can never be equivalent to Elohim in the fullest sense (Isa 45:5, 6, 12, 18–19, 21–23). Only Elohim is the Creator, is without a beginning, and is all powerful, all knowing and all present. Man will never attain to this level.

The miraculous and transformational process of man metamorphosing from being a physical and human creature to becoming an immortal and glorified child of the Most High, in theological terms, is called theosis, a Greek word meaning “deification or the act of becoming like deity.” This is an ancient Christian concept that is still held by many in the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church and refers to the spiritual process that occurs resulting in the deification of man. The goal of theosis is to become “like” (though not equal to) Elohim and to become eventually united with our Father in heaven in a deep familial way. Theosis is the biblical concept of a redeemed or spiritually regenerated individual “becoming a partaker YHVH’s divine nature” (2 Pet 1:4), and being adopted into the family of Elohim (see the verses below). It is about man becoming like Elohim and becoming part of the family of Elohim as a child of Elohim (John 10:34; Ps 82:1; 1 John 3:1–3).

A person’s theosis process is an internal work of the Ruach haKodesh (the Set-Apart or Holy Spirit) and begins  with repentance of sin, and then identification with Yeshua as the Son of Elohim at one’s baptism for the remission of sins. As one takes these initial first steps of becoming a son of Elohim at one’s baptism, it is then that one becomes a new creation through Yeshua and the work of his Set-Apart Spirit (Gal 2:20; 2 Cor 5:17). At that time, one is begotten or conceived as an embryonic child in the womb of the Holy Spirit. Later one, when one receives one’s glorified body at the resurrection of the righteous dead, one will be fully born or born again and adopted into the family of Elohim as a full-fledged son of Elohim, for, as the Scripture says, we will be like him, for we will see him as he is as John informs us in this first epistle:

Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of Elohim: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of Elohim, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure. (1 John 3:1–30

Paul refers to theosis in several places when he uses the term adoption.

For you have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but you have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. (Rom 8:15)

And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body. (Rom 8:23; also 9:4)

To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. (Gal 4:5)

Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Yeshua the Messiah to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will… (Eph 1:5)

The apostolic writers make further reference to theosis in several other places as well.

Continue reading →
 

The Twice Daily Sacrifices and the Saints Daily Devotions

Posted on by
Reply

The Tabernacle of Moses’ twice daily offering known as the continual burnt offering (Heb. olah tamiyd) as commanded by YHVH Elohim was offered on the bronze altar (Exod 29:42) was the central feature and beating heart of the tabernacle. This sacrificial offering has great spiritual implications for the serious disciple of Yeshua and relates to his or her daily life of devotion, praise and worship to YHVH Elohim. Christians now refer to this time in the saint’s life as one’s “daily devotional.” Let’s now discover the amazing and prophetic parallels between the twice daily sacrifices prescribed under the Torah’s Law of Moses and this quotidian activity in the life of the serious believer. 

The word continual (Heb. tamiyd) in verse Exodus 29:38 means “continually.” The Hebrew word for burnt offering is olah meaning “ascent, stairway or steps,” and derives from the basic Hebrew verb, alah, meaning “to go up, climb or ascend.” In this sacrificial offering, the fire consumed the entire animal, and the word olah refers to the smoke of this whole burnt offering ascending to heaven, which to YHVH was a “sweet aroma” (verse 41). Why did the Creator of the universe consider such a mundane thing as smoke from cooking meat to be a pleasant aroma? Let’s dig into this idea and discover the rich and significance implications of this curious religious ritual.

The olah was an offering or gift (Lev 1:2, Heb. qorban)to YHVH and had to be a kosher animal such as a bull, goat, ram, turtle dove or a pigeon as long as it was a perfect specimen without defect (Lev 1:10). What was the point of this sacrificial offering? If an Israelite sinned, he could bring this gift-offering to the door of the tabernacle where he would place his hands upon the head of the animal, after which the priests would slaughter it, and sprinkle its blood around the altar of sacrifice just inside the door of the tabernacle (Lev 1:2, 4, 5). The meat was then prepared and arranged on the altar and entirely burnt (Lev 1:6–17). When the sinner laid his hands on the animal, it was as if he were transferring his sins onto the innocent, blemish-free animal, where upon YHVH accepted it as an atonement for the person’s sin (Lev 1:4). In reality, offering was a down payment on a debt that the sinner owed to YHVH, which prophetically pointed to and would ultimately be paid by Yeshua’s death on the cross.

The writer of Hebrews clearly teaches that this offering (along with all the other offerings in the sacrificial system) pointed to Yeshua, our Great High Priest, whose atoning death on the cross fulfilled all the types and shadows of the Levitical, sacrificial system (Heb 4:14–5:7; 7:1–10:18).

Besides the obvious antetypes pointing to Yeshua’s death on the cross, what else can we learn from the olah tamiyd offering rituals? What are the spiritual implications and the lessons to be learned for the redeemed believer living in the twenty-first century? Matthew Henry in his commentary on Numbers 28:1–8 sums up the main relevant object lesson to be learned from the twice daily sacrifices in this concise way:

The particular law of the daily sacrifice, a lamb in the morning and a lamb in the evening, which, for the constancy of it as duly as the day came, is called a continual burnt-offering (v. 3), which intimates that when we are bidden to pray always, and to pray without ceasing, it is intended that at least every morning and every evening we offer up our solemn prayers and praises to [Elohim]. (emphasis added)

Thus this olah tamiyd sacrifice was connected to the rising and setting of the sun as implied by the words of the psalmist (Ps 113:3). At the same time, the priest was to burn incense on the incense altar (Exod 30:7–8) as part of the olah tamiyd sacrifice. This obviously signifies a spirit of repentance, self-deprecation and humility coupled with praise and worshipful adoration on the part of the saint while engaged in prayer to one’s Father in heaven. 

The biblical writers foresaw a time coming when either there would be no tabernacle or temple in which to offer the sacrifices and incense, or a designated place of worship would be inaccessible to the Israelite. In this situation, Hosea admonishes sinful Israel to return to YHVH and to offer up the sacrifices (lit. the calves or young bulls) of one’s  lips, while expecting Elohim to graciously receive them and take away their iniquity (Hos 14:2). Paul embraced this idea when he admonished the saints to become as “living sacrifices…unto Eohim” (Rom 12:2). In John’s vision of heaven, he sees the prayers of the saints as being like sweet smelling incense before the throne of the Almighty One (Rev 5:8; 8:3). Not only does YHVH view the prayers of the righteous as incense, but their praises of him as a sacrifice or a thanksgiving offering as well (Jer 33:11; Heb 13:15). The psalmist goes on to connect the dots between the olah tamiyd sacrifice, incense, prayer and praise when he writes,

Let my prayer be set forth before thee as incense; and the lifting up of my hands as the evening sacrifice. (Ps 141:2)

But how is the non-Levite priest supposed to offer incense before YHVH? This is done through prayer and worship as the prophet Malachi indicates:

For from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering, for my name shall be great among the heathen, saith YHVH of Hosts. (Mal 1:11)

The Torah prohibits offering sacrifices anywhere YHVH has not placed his name. What’s more, Yeshua has fulfilled the sacrificial system by his death on the cross once and for all as the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews clearly informs us, and has become the saints’ Great High Priest. So how then do the people of the nations offer up sacrifices in every place as Malachi prophesies except but through prayer and praise? The same is true, of course, for redeemed believers who are now part of Yeshua’s royal priesthood as Peter testifies: 

Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to Elohim by Yeshua the Messiah. (1 Pet 2:5)

However, since there is no longer either a temple or a Levitical priesthood, yet the saints are called priest of Yeshua (Rev 1:6; 5:10; 20:6), how shall we as the saints of the Most High fulfill our priestly duties if not by serving our Master Yeshua through our twice daily prayer and praise?

 

The Tabernacle of Moses Foretells the Saints’ Immortal Destiny

Posted on by
Reply

Psalm 77:13 tells us, “Your way, O God, is in the sanctuary; Who is so great a God as our God?” This may be one of the greatest understatements in the entire Bible, and the Tabernacle of Moses has been one of the most overlooked subjects in the mainstream Christian church for the past 1,900 years. The Tabernacle of Moses contains multiple layers of biblical truth and is a veritable treasure trove relating to YHVH’s glorious plan of salvation or redemption for sinful mankind. It contains the prophetic blueprint of the Christian’s spiritual journey from their initial encounter with Yeshua the Messiah to becoming his resurrected, gloried bride living with him for eternity in the New Jerusalem as this video-teaching explosively reveals.

Free written study notes for this teaching are available at https://hoshanarabbah.org/blog/2026/02/15/nathans-commentary-on-parashat-terumah-exodus-211-2418/.

If you would like to be part of Oasis Elim’s weekly online live Shabbat meeting—an outreach of Hoshana Rabbah, please email Nathan at HoshanaRabbah@earthlink.net for more information.