Genesis 44

Genesis 44:18, And Judah came near. There is much to learn about the prophetic significance of Judah coming near to Joseph. The modern Jewish people are the descendants of Judah. The the children of Judah or the Jews became the Southern Kingdom of Israel, and Joseph’s sons Ephraim and Manasseh became the Northern Kingdom or house of Israel and eventually the “lost sheep of the house of Israel” as we have discussed previously and written about and proven extensively elsewhere from both the Scriptures and secular non-biblical sources.

Prophetically-speaking, every Christian who is minimally familiar with the Bible knows who the most notable descendant of the tribe of Judah is? The Lion of the Tribe of Judah and the Root of Jesse is, of course, Yeshua the Messiah. Rev 5:5). When you came to faith in Yeshua, did he seek you or did you seek him when you were lost? He called everyone of us to himself, and we simply responded to that call! (See Matt 20:16; Rom 8:28, 30; 1 Cor 1:9, 26; 7:17, 20; 2 Thes 2:12; 2 Tim 1:9; 1 Pet 2:9 cp.Rom 5:8; Luke 19:10; Matt 18:11.) 

Why is Judah coming near to Joseph (who he does not yet recognize as Joseph)? He was motivated out of love for his father Jacob (See Gen 44:18–34). Similarly, Yeshua was motivated to come near to us out of love for his Father as well (See John 8:28; chapter 17).

Judah offered to lay down his life as a ransom for his youngest brother (Gen 44:33). Who does this point to prophetically? Yeshua freely gave his life as a substitute for his each one of us (Mark 10:45; Matt 20:28; 1 Tim 2:5; John 10:11, 15, 17–18; 1 John 3:16).

Please note that Judah is an antetype (prophetic forerunner) of Yeshua the Messiah.

• Both sought to please their fathers.
• Both acted out of unconditional love for their younger brother.
• Both stood to gain nothing personally, but rather stood to lose much, if their plan did not work. Judah, a prince, would become a slave in Egypt; Yeshua would become a slave to death and hell, if he sinned.

It is interesting to note that classic Christian commentator Matthew Henry draws a similar analogy between Judah’s actions here and Messiah Yeshua as well (A Commentary On the Whole Bible, vol. 1, p. 243, by Matthew Henry).

Judah’s love for his father and Benjamin and his willingness to lay down his life as a ransom to become a slave in Egypt to Joseph is analogous to Messiah Yeshua’s love for the lost sheep of the house of Israel to whom he directed his outreach ministry and to ransom them in order to bring them back into the fold of Israel (John 10:15–16; Matt 10:6; 15:24).

Paul carried the same burden for his fellow Israelites as did Yeshua (Rom 9:1–5). Who does Paul later go on to talk about and extend his heart burden to in Romans 9:23–24? Remember that the term Gentile simply means “ethnic or people groups, or the people of the nations.” When Paul uses the term Gentiles here, he is specifically referring to the lost sheep of the house of Israel who were the descendants of Joseph. Paul had the same intense love for his Jewish brethren as he did for those “people groups of the nations” whom he equates with the lost, adulterous and apostate house of Israel (the Northern Kingdom of the ten tribes of Israel). Compare Romans 9:25 with Hosea 2:23 (the former being a direct quote from the latter) in context with the whole Book of Hosea, which is addressed particularly to the apostate house of Israel and who had become “lost” among the nations, of which Joseph in Egypt is a prophetic antetype.

Genesis 44:32–34, Became surety for the lad. On this passage Christian commentator Matthew Henry states, “Judah’s faithful cleaving to Benjamin, now, in his distress, was recompensed long afterwards by the tribe of Benjamin keeping with the tribe of Judah, when the other tribes deserted it” (Matthew Henry Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible, p. 56). This is a small piece of biblical trivia that had historical ramifications for hundreds of years later.

It is amazing that some 800 years later the fraternal love between these two brothers remained in their collective psyches such that the tribe of Benjamin remained loyal to the tribe of Judah. 

What does this say about generational blessings (and curses) or attitudes that are passed on down to one’s descendants? If curses can be passed on down to the third or fourth generation (Exod 20:5), how much more so blessings? The Book of Proverbs states that, “Death and life are in the power of the tongue, and those who love it will eat its fruit,” (Prov 18:21) and that, “A wholesome tongue is a tree of life, but perverseness in it breaks the spirit,” (Prov 15:4). ­

Generations of our descendants can be affected positively or negatively by the inclination of our hearts and the words of our mouth. 

It had been Judah’s original idea to sell Joseph to slave traders. Since that time, Judah’s heart had changed, so that now he was willing to lay down his life for his brother, Benjamin, Joseph’s only full brother. This change of heart on Judah’s part and the resulting outpouring of love for his youngest brother had lasting positive results.

Did Judah did not first recognize Joseph;  Joseph had to reveal himself to Judah and his other brothers (Gen 45:1–4). Judah was “blinded” to Joseph’s identity. This a prophetic picture of the Jews’ future spiritual blindness to who the “Gentiles” were and are (Rom 11:25). As we have seen in previous studies, Joseph was a type of the Messiah as well as the father of Ephraim and Manasseh, the dominate tribes of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, who went apostate and became as “lost sheep” among the nations of the world (Hos 7:8; 8:8; Ezek 34:16 and numerous other Scriptures). Therefore, Joseph is a prophetic picture of the “lost sheep of the house of Israel” and the Messiah who would come to seek out those lost sheep (Matt 15:24; 10:6). And whom does Judah represent? Judah is a prophetic antetype of the Lion of the Tribe of Judah who would later come as the Messiah to redeem his “brother,” who would be lost in the spiritual Egypt of this world. He also represent the Jews of Southern Kingdom of the house of Judah most of whom would be “blind” to their Jewish Messiah. Thus in this story, it appears that Judah is a prophetic picture of both the Jewish people and the Jewish Messiah. 

This dual role that Judah to which Judah seems to prophetically point has been a head scratcher for the ancient Jewish sages. They have seen in the story of Joseph, the Suffering Servant, a Messiah Son of Joseph figure who they saw would be a descendant of Ephraim, and who would come to redeem the lost sheep or exiles of the house of Israel in preparation for a second Messiah to come whom they refer to as the Conquering King or Messiah the Son of David, (Mesorah PublicationsTheArtScroll Bereishis,vol. 1b, pp. 2121–2122). They see these Messiahs as two separate individuals. Yet in our story of Joseph and Judah we see the antetypes of these two Messiahs acting out their roles at the same time. Judah and Joseph point to both comings of Messiah Yeshua. At his first coming, Yeshua came as the Suffering Servant to redeem a remnant of lost Judah in addition to a much larger portion of “the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Yet at his second coming, this same Messiah Son of Joseph will come back as the Lion of Judah to be revealed to his Jewish brothers (the modern day Jewish people) who had previously rejected him (Zech 12:10).

Genesis 45