“Since Jesus is the Lord of the Sabbath, I can ignore and break the Sabbath”—Say what?

Matthew 12:1–14, On the Sabbath. (See also Mark 2:23–28; also see note on John 5:18.) From this passage, many Christians reason that since Yeshua is the Lord of the Sabbath, it was therefore permissible for him (and us) to break it, that is, to ignore the biblical Sabbath commands, and even to violate them flagrantly. Billions of Christians have been taught this and believe it. However does this passage substantiate this line of reasoning from biblical Hebraic thought,  even simple logic and common sense? Let’s examine this issue. 

Let’s now examine this passage carefully, instead of just thoughtlessly accepting church tradition.

For starters, there is no law in the Torah prohibiting picking food to eat as one is walking along the way. This is not harvesting a field—something which is work, and is thus forbidden on the Sabbath. Instead, Yeshua was violating a non-biblical, man-made Jewish legal regulation.

Moreover, this scripture teaches us that there are levels of Torah laws, and some laws take precedence over others. For example, the priests technically violated the Sabbath during the tabernacle and temple service, but were guiltless because Torah commanded them to do certain things on the Shabbat that otherwise would have been forbidden. The Talmud explains this by saying that whenever a positive commandment and a negative commandment contradict, the positive commandment takes precedence over or supersedes the negative one (b. Shabbat 133a). What Yeshua is teaching in this passage is that the temple service trumps the Sabbath, and human need or saving life (i.e. the ox-in-the-ditch scenario) trumps the temple service. This view is confirmed by the Jewish sages (b. Yoma 85b). In verse six, when Yeshua said, “But I say unto you, that in this place is one [a supplied word and not found in the Greek] greater than the temple” he is not saying that he is greater than the Sabbath, and hence it is permissible for him to break it. If this were true, then two things would be true which contradict the Scriptures: a) It is permissible for Yeshua to sin, for sin is the violation of the Torah, and b) YHVH magnifies his word above his name (Ps 138:2); therefore, he’s obeying his own word (making him a liar!) by breaking the Sabbath, which he commanded men to keep (Exod 20:8–11, the fourth commandment). What Yeshua is really saying here is that the thing greater than the temple was the hunger of his disciples.

Furthermore, Leviticus 18:5 states, “You shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments: which if a man do, he shall live in them.” The Jewish sages take this to mean that a commandment can be set aside to save life (again, the ox-in-the-ditch scenario). The saving of a life trumps the keeping of the commandment, since this verse says that man is to “live by [the Torah]” not die by it. Therefore, it is permissible to “violate” the Sabbath to preserve life. In fact, the sages go so far as to say that any commandment could be broken to save a life except those against murder and sexual immorality (b. Sanhedrin 74a).

This is why Yeshua quotes Hosea 6:6 that YHVH desires mercy (or loving-kindness), not sacrifice; the knowledge of Elohim, not burnt offerings (Matt 12:7). The heart and spirit of the Torah, in Yeshua’s thinking, are the weightier matters of the Torah although they do not replace the letter of the Torah. In Yeshua’s mind, to properly keep the Torah, one needs to keep both the letter and the spirit (Matt 23:23).

On several occasions, Yeshua used the Hosea 6:6 passage to teach us that love, compassion and mercy for one’s fellowman takes precedence (at times) over fulfilling the letter of the law, although this is not a justification for habitually and intentionally violating the Torah (Matt 9:12–13; Mark 12:33; Luke 10:36–37). Paul echoes this truth about the preeminence of love in the famous chapter on love in 1 Corinthians 13. There we learn that all manner of spiritual activity is meaningless in the eyes of Elohim if it is not accompanied with love.

In Mark 2:23–28 (the corollary passage to Matthew 12:1–7), Yeshua declares, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath; therefore, the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath” (verses 27–28).

Yeshua is greater than the Sabbath because he is the lord of the Sabbath, for he created the Sabbath (verse 8), and because he was the perfect epitome of walking out both the letter and spirit of the Torah. Whatever he was doing on the Sabbath, it wasn’t a violation of the Sabbath’s no work principle. Also, saving life was greater than the temple service, as is Yeshua who was the Living Torah-Word of Elohim incarnate.


6 thoughts on ““Since Jesus is the Lord of the Sabbath, I can ignore and break the Sabbath”—Say what?

  1. Your picture of the wheat field reminded me that wheat is now a GMO=GRAIN BRAIN! Also reminded me that when I was taking care of my parents (now deceased) I was told that I could do whatever was necessary on the Sabbath to take care of a life since I had to prepare their meals and clean up after them. Common sense isn’t all that common anymore 🙁 Yeshua as our living Torah makes it clear. Realize=real eyes! Also the Sabbath was made for man-not just the Jews!(were Adam and Eve Jewish?! A weekly vacation from the world to rest in ABBA’s arms 🙂

  2. Very good! I appreciate the idea that the positive Torah commandment trumps the negative commandment. I hadn’t heard that before. I look forward to thinking that through some more.

    Also, the Scriptures seem to only ever say, “THE Sabbath “, not “a Sabbath“ or “your Sabbath“.

    But I do have this question. In the first use of the phrase, “the Sabbath“…

    Exo 16:29  “See! The LORD has given you the Sabbath; therefore on the sixth day he gives you bread for two days. Remain each of you in his place; let no one go out of his place on the seventh day.”

    How was Yeshua justified in walking through the grain fields when the first commandment regarding keeping the Sabbath says, “Remain each of you in his place…”?

    • Context, context, context. The context of the Exod 16:29 command was the Israelite’s encampment in the wilderness and relates to gathering manna. We’re no longer camping in the wilderness, and we’re no longer gathering manna. So if we can’t apply the literal physical contextual principle, what is the overall spiritual principle that’s applicable to us? Here’s my explanation of this verse from my Bible commentary:

      Exodus 16:29, Let every man remain. The essential point of this prohibition is to not go out and gather manna on the Sabbath, but to rest on this day from the routine work of supporting one’s family. This command didn’t prohibit the Israelites from gathering together on the Sabbath for purposes of teaching, worship, prayer, fellowship or spiritual edification or else YHVH’s command for the Israelites to gather together on the Sabbath for a “holy convocation” (Lev 23:2) would be contradictory. Were this command merely an injunction to not leave one’s dwelling place on the Sabbath, then Yeshua and the apostles visiting synagogues on the Sabbath would have been a violation of this Torah command. Isaiah 58:13 could be viewed as the corollary passage to Exodus 16:29. There YHVH instructs his people not to profane the Sabbath by doing their own pleasure, not doing their own ways, and not speaking their own words on this day. Instead, it is a holy day to YHVH and a day to focus on and honor him.

Share your thoughts...