What America Would Look Like Under Sanders’ Socialism

From http://www.investors.com/politics/capital-hill/what-america-would-look-like-under-sanders-socialism/

We would be seeing more of these in Bernie Sanders' socialist America. (iStock)

We would be seeing more of these in Bernie Sanders’ socialist America. (iStock)

To celebrate the Monthly Labor Review’s centennial, the Bureau of Labor Statistics is taking a look back at the last 100 years. One of the articles in this series — “The life of American workers in 1915” — is eminently fascinating and shows in stark relief just how far we have come in America since then.

Life in the U.S. certainly was not nasty, brutish and short a century ago. But it was almost primitive relative to what we have in front of us today. And it’s the sort of crushing existence that socialism — yes, even Bernie Sanders’ “democratic” version of that poisonous system of government — would take us back to.

Don’t think so? Below is a glimpse of how things looked back then, according the article. Consider the contrasts with today’s life in America, and then rejoin us at the bottom of this post.

• “If you were alive in 1915, chances are you rented your house or apartment; the ratio of renters to homeowners was about 4-1 in 1920.”

• “The typical home of a working-class family was crowded, somewhat disorderly, and without modern conveniences.”

• A “family of nine has a boarder to help pay the rent. He is a night worker, and in the daytime can always be seen asleep in one of the beds. … There is a bath tub, but the clothes wringer and last winter’s sleds are always kept in it. This is not the home of a very poor family.”

• “Apparently, several children in the described family shared a bed, and the family members may have all shared the same bedroom. Few of the homes of working-class families had running water, and almost none had running hot water.”

• “Whether or not your abode was a single-family home or a crowded tenement, it probably was heated by a potbelly stove or by a coal furnace in the basement.”

• “Your home probably wasn’t yet wired for electricity; less than a third of homes had electric lights rather than gas or kerosene lamps.”

• “If your home had an indoor toilet, the toilet likely was located in a closet or a storage area. It would be a few more years until it was common for toilets, sinks, and bathtubs to share a room.”

• “If you didn’t work at home, you also may have traveled to your job by foot, or you may have gotten there on horseback or by mule.”

• “The predominant occupation group was that of craftsmen, laborers, and operatives, and professional and technical workers — today’s largest group — made up less than 5% of all workers.”

Things are quite different now, and none of the advances we enjoy — take for granted, even — has been brought to us by socialism, not even today’s better working conditions, for which the socialist labor movement takes credit. All have been the products of free-market capitalism. It is the lone system that has the structural incentive — the profit motive — that drives people to produce the advances we’ve seen.

Socialism has the exact opposite effect. It motivates people to live off of others, and requires coercion and force. That’s a plan for disaster, as any reading of the history of the last 100 years will show. It’s not coincidental that the Cubas, North Koreas, Venezuelas, Greeces of 2016 look a lot like the America of 1915.

 

Share your thoughts...